AAAs – in the aforementioned sense – find their legal basis in the Double Taxation Conventions (DBA), in the respective articles on mutual agreement procedures. Germany has concluded DBA with more than 90 countries in the world. Most of these DBAs follow the OECD`s draft international agreement. The provisions on mutual agreement procedures are set out in Article 25, paragraphs 1 to 3, of the OECD Model Convention. On 27 March 2020, the Russian Ministry of Finance published an updated version of the bill ”On the amendment of the first part of the Russian tax code to improve price tax control and the procedure for concluding advanced price agreements” (hereafter the ”Bill”). Upon receipt of the application, the BZSt verifies that all conditions (including the applicant`s agreement not to challenge the fees) for the execution of an APP procedure are met. An APP procedure is only implemented if the application is admissible and justified. Jurisdiction of the BZSt with respect to mutual agreement, arbitration and APAs Proceedings The bill seeks to clarify several provisions relating to the definition of a controlled transaction. These amendments are intended to: bilateral and multilateral APAs are generally bilateral or multilateral, i.e. they also conclude agreements between the taxpayer and one or more foreign tax administrations under the control of the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) under Denerl`s tax treaties.

[3] The subject benefits from such agreements, since he is assured that income from covered transactions is not subject to double taxation on the part of the IRS and the relevant foreign tax authorities. The IRS policy is to ”encourage” taxpayers to apply for bilateral or multilateral APA where there are provisions of the competent authority. 2. Allow the subject to enter into a unilateral APA if the Russian and foreign tax authorities do not reach a mutual agreement after consideration of a draft APP. Download our transfer pricing brochure for more details Companies that wish to avoid the threat of economic double taxation in advance can apply for an APA. In Germany, the Bundeszentralamt for Steuern (BZSt) is responsible for the implementation of these procedures. Applications to open an APA can therefore be filed directly with the BZSt. Here are the models of applicants` declarations that the applicant must submit to the authorities after the signing of the pre-price agreement. The appendix begins with the definition of the different types of APA and describes the objectives of the APA process.

The ability to participate in an APA MAP is considered with respect to contractual issues and other factors such as the audit status of the subject. Issues relating to multilateral GPAs (i.e., where there is more than one bilateral agreement) are also addressed. The central point of the annex deals in detail with the whole MAP-APA procedure, starting with the meetings before the presentation, on the presentation of a proposal, its evaluation by the tax authorities, the discussion and conclusion of the mutual agreement, the implementation of this mutual agreement and, finally, the follow-up of the agreement and a possible extension. While the Schedule focuses on the direction of tax authorities, it takes the opportunity to discuss how the taxpayer can best contribute to this process. A pre-price agreement (APA) is a prior agreement between a tax payer and a tax authority on an appropriate transfer pricing method (TPM) for a number of transactions involved during a specified period[1] (”covered transactions”). In October 1999, the OECD published an update of the OECD guidelines on clearing prices for multinational companies and tax administrations in 1995 (the so-called ”guidelines”). This update takes the form of a new schedule to the guidelines, which contains guidelines for the implementation of ex ante price agreements as part of the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP-APAs).