Should the Authority inform the contractors who manage the contracts for services contained in the framework, i.e. that we have entered into a national contract which is now put into a framework? The ojui was tendered last month, but we were not notified. And for suppliers included in the executives, don`t take the company for granted – keep marketing your products or services to the purchasing authorities! Although the CCTA and its successor strongly stated that G-Cat complied with EU guidelines, the European Commission was not convinced and in 2000 published ”pre-infringement” communications requesting more information on the operation of G-Cat and S-Cat, the IT services executive. Although the case did not result in a formal infringement procedure, it reflects the lack of legal certainty with respect to the framework conditions permitted in the public sector and how they should be managed. To what extent is it possible for a purchasing organization to vary depending on the function and/or structure in which the prizes are made available in a mini-competition held below the framework? If you are not mistaken, you are proposing changes to the terms of the framework agreement, but only for that one provider and one call. When the distribution company chooses a supplier on the basis of the initial offers, it is not necessary to inform all suppliers of the framework that they are doing so, when this may have advantages in terms of transparency and future competitiveness. In the situation where you are conducting a mini-competition or if you are following the negotiated procedure, it is clear to inform all executive providers that you are doing so in order to obtain a competitive response. What are the consequences of merging or cooperating with two OJEU-compliant frameworks? If you are not on one frame, but on the other? Does this give them automatic exposure to the frame you`re not on? I see much more cooperation between these organizations and I wonder if this should be seen as an opportunity or a threat? Alternatively, some executives allow for direct allocation, i.e. no mini-contests or cancellations.

The work could be awarded to a bidder on the basis of a geographic lot already agreed under the framework agreement. Some frameworks are also allocated on the basis of performance measured throughout the partnership. The reduction in tendering costs also applies to suppliers, as the implementation of the tendering process can be costly and time-depending. Clearly, the main advantage for suppliers to have a framework agreement is the opportunity to obtain valuable business opportunities. In accordance with public procurement legislation. When a framework agreement is financed by public funds and the estimated total value of all potential calls exceeds the EU contracting threshold, it should be published in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 240 of 16.12.2006, p. 1). One framework we audited uses a Most Favoured customer clause that prevents suppliers from offering better prices in another game. We believe that this is a reduction and distortion of competition, since it actually sets a price floor below which these suppliers cannot operate, even if they wish. If flexibility is an important consideration, you need to weigh more operators on the framework against overload for managing a larger supply reserve and the lower income that each trader will deduct. Hello, as a beginner, I would just like to clarify some concepts in framework contracts, i.e.

1. Is it used in times of emergency? 2. Can we preserve integrity and, on the other hand, get optimal value for money? Do we have to tender under a framework contract or is it like a one-handed purchase that is to go to a non-tender supplier? Are OJEU appeals subject to the maximum rule of 50% of the original value? I appreciate the fact that the value announced in the opinion of the Official Journal of the European Union limits